4
|
|
Some people claim that we are made for happiness. We are created to have a good time, the best possible time we can. People who believe this aren't necessarily selfish, since they can argue that the best way to have a good time is to help other people have a good time -- that by bringing pleasure to others, you will find happiness yourself. The chief problem here is, What do you mean by "happiness"? And for a great many people it will mean physical comfort -- a nice house, good clothes, a plasma TV, and a new car. And we must ask whether people's lives necessarily have deeper and fuller meaning just because they have nice houses, good clothes, laptops, and new cars. Their lives may be emptier than ever. Other people answer the question by saying, "We're only human" -- by which they seem to mean that we are highly developed animals, but nothing more. Ideas about love, or God, or self-sacrifice, are only wishful thinking -- attempts to escape from the unpleasant fact that we are "earthbound." Much better, the argument goes, to face up to the fact and make the best of it. Notice that this answer is as dogmatic as that of the most unyielding theology. And we must surely ask whether there is not, after all, a basic difference between an animal's shelter and a cathedral; between the beast's cry of fear and a symphony; between the meal of an animal and the sacrament of the Lord's Supper.
The thing that is significant about these and other answers to the question "What is man?" is not that they are totally false, but that they are incomplete. We owe some allegiance to the State -- but we owe other allegiances as well. "Happiness" may be a part of that for which we are created -- but we are created for self-sacrifice as well. We are part animal, and must have food and drink and sleep to stay alive-but food and drink and sleep and nothing else would soon bore us to tears, because there is more to us than merely animal desire. And so we could continue with other current answers.
Let us therefore look at the Biblical answer and see if it does not give us a more fully satisfactory description of our human situation.
|